| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 2 | |
| 1. |  | DI SALVO, L.; GARCÍA, J.E.; PUENTE, M.L.; AMIGO, J.; ANRIQUEZ, A.; BARLOCCO, C.; BENINTENDE, S.; BOCHATAY, T.; BORTOLATO, M.; CASSÁN, F.; CASTAÑO, C.; CATAFESTA, M.; CONIGLIO, A.; DÍAZ, M.; GALIÁN, L.R.; GALLACE, E.; GARCÍA, P.; GARCÍA DE SALAMONE, I.E.; LANDA, M.; LIERNUR, G.; MANEIRO, M.L.; MASSA, R.; MALINVERNI, J.; MARCHESSI, N.; MONTELEONE, E.; OVIEDO, S.; POBLITI, L.; PORTELA, G.; RADOVANCICH, D; RIGHES, S.; ROCHA, R.; RODRÍGUEZ CÁCERES, E.; ROSSI, A.; SANTELLA, G.; TORTORA, M.L.; TREJO, N.; VALENZUELA, J.A.; VALLEJO, D. The drop plate method as an alternative for Azospirillum spp viable cell enumeration within the consensus protocol of the REDCAI network. (Brief report). [La técnica de la microgota como alternativa para el recuento de Azospirillum spp. dentro del protocolo de la Red de Control de Calidad de Inoculantes (REDCAI).] Revista Argentina de Microbiología, 2022, Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages 152-157. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2021.05.002 Article history: Received 24 November 2020, Accepted 12 May 2021, Available online 7 July 2021. -- Corresponding author. M.L. Puente, e-mail address: puente.mariana@inta.gob.ar -- LICENSE: Este es un artículo Open Access bajo la licencia...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| 2. | | JURBURG, S.D.; ÁLVAREZ BLANCO, M.J.; CHATZINOTAS, A.; KAZEM, A.; KÖNIG-RIES, B.; BABIN, D.; SMALLA, K.; CERECETTO, V.; FERNANDEZ-GNECCO, G.; COVACEVICH, F.; VIRUEL, E.; BERNASCHINA, Y.; LEONI, C.; GARAYCOCHEA, S.; TERRA, J.A.; FRESIA, P.; FIGUEROLA, E.L.M.; WALL, L.G.; COVELLI, J.M.; AGNELLO, A.C.; NIETO, E.E.; FESTA, S.; DOMINICI, L.E,; ALLEGRINI, M.; ZABALOY, M.C.; MORALES, M.E.; ERIJMAN, L.; CONIGLIO, A´.; CASSÁN, F.D.; NIEVAS, S.; ROLDÁN, D.M.; MENES, R.; VAZ JAURI, P.; MARRERO, C.S.; MASSA, A.M.; REVETRIA, M.A.M.; FERNÁNDEZ-SCAVINO, A.; PEREIRA-MORA, L.; MARTÍNEZ, S.; FRENE, J.P. Datathons: fostering equitability in data reuse in ecology. Science & Society. Trends in Microbiology. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2024.02.010 -- OPEN ACCESS [Article in Press] Article history: Available online 21 March 2024. -- Correspondence: Jurburg, S.D.; Department of Applied Microbial Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany; email:s.d.jurburg@gmail.com -- LICENSE:...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| Registros recuperados : 2 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
16/10/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
20/09/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
CUBBAGE, F.; BALMELLI, G.; BUSSONI, A.; NOELLEMEYER, E.; PACHAS, A.N.; FASSOLA, H.; COLCOMBET, L.; ROSSNER, B.; FREY, G.; DUBE, F.; LOPES DE SILVA, M.; STEVENSON, H.; HAMILTON, J.; HUBBARD, W. |
|
Afiliación : |
FREDERICK CUBBAGE; GUSTAVO DANIEL BALMELLI HERNANDEZ, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; ADRIANA BUSSONI; ELKE NOELLEMEYER; ANIBAL N. PACHAS; HUGO FASSOLA; LUIS COLCOMBET; BELÉN ROSSNER; GREGORY FREY; FRANCIS DUBE; MARCIO LOPES DE SILVA; HAYLEY STEVENSON; JAMES HAMILTON; WILLIAM HUBBARD. |
|
Título : |
Comparing silvopastoral systems and prospects in eight regions of the world. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2012 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agroforest Systems, 2012, v. 86, p. 303-314 |
|
DOI : |
10.1007/s10457-012-9482-z |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
History article: Received: 20 October 2011; Accepted: 6 January 2012; Published online: 5 February 2012. |
|
Contenido : |
Silvopasture systems combine trees, forage, and livestock in a variety of different species and management regimes, depending on the biophysical, economic, cultural, and market factors in a region. We describe and compare actual farm practices and current research trials of silvopastoral systems in eight regions within seven countries of the world: Misiones and Corrientes provinces, Argentina; La Pampa province, Argentina; northwestern Minas Gerais, Brazil; the Ayse´n region of Patagonia, Chile; the North Island of New Zealand; the Southeast United States; Paraguay; and Uruguay. Some countries use native trees and existing forests; some use plantations, particularly of exotic species. Natural forest silvopasture systems generally add livestock in extensive systems, to capture the benefits of shade, forage, and income
diversification without much added inputs. Plantation forest systems are more purposive and intensive, with more focus on joint production and profits, for small
owners, large ranches, and timber companies. Trends suggest that more active management of both natural and planted silvopastoral systems will be required to
enhance joint production of timber and livestock, achieve income diversification and reduce financial risk, makemore profit, improve environmental benefits,
and realize more resilience to adapt to climate change. |
|
Palabras claves : |
ADOPTION; NEW ZEALAND; SILVOPASTORAL SYSTEMS; SILVOPASTURE; SOUTH AMERICA; USA. |
|
Thesagro : |
SILVOPASTOREO. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02447naa a2200385 a 4500
001 1051153
005 2019-09-20
008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1007/s10457-012-9482-z$2DOI
100 1 $aCUBBAGE, F.
245 $aComparing silvopastoral systems and prospects in eight regions of the world.
260 $c2012
500 $aHistory article: Received: 20 October 2011; Accepted: 6 January 2012; Published online: 5 February 2012.
520 $aSilvopasture systems combine trees, forage, and livestock in a variety of different species and management regimes, depending on the biophysical, economic, cultural, and market factors in a region. We describe and compare actual farm practices and current research trials of silvopastoral systems in eight regions within seven countries of the world: Misiones and Corrientes provinces, Argentina; La Pampa province, Argentina; northwestern Minas Gerais, Brazil; the Ayse´n region of Patagonia, Chile; the North Island of New Zealand; the Southeast United States; Paraguay; and Uruguay. Some countries use native trees and existing forests; some use plantations, particularly of exotic species. Natural forest silvopasture systems generally add livestock in extensive systems, to capture the benefits of shade, forage, and income diversification without much added inputs. Plantation forest systems are more purposive and intensive, with more focus on joint production and profits, for small owners, large ranches, and timber companies. Trends suggest that more active management of both natural and planted silvopastoral systems will be required to enhance joint production of timber and livestock, achieve income diversification and reduce financial risk, makemore profit, improve environmental benefits, and realize more resilience to adapt to climate change.
650 $aSILVOPASTOREO
653 $aADOPTION
653 $aNEW ZEALAND
653 $aSILVOPASTORAL SYSTEMS
653 $aSILVOPASTURE
653 $aSOUTH AMERICA
653 $aUSA
700 1 $aBALMELLI, G.
700 1 $aBUSSONI, A.
700 1 $aNOELLEMEYER, E.
700 1 $aPACHAS, A.N.
700 1 $aFASSOLA, H.
700 1 $aCOLCOMBET, L.
700 1 $aROSSNER, B.
700 1 $aFREY, G.
700 1 $aDUBE, F.
700 1 $aLOPES DE SILVA, M.
700 1 $aSTEVENSON, H.
700 1 $aHAMILTON, J.
700 1 $aHUBBARD, W.
773 $tAgroforest Systems, 2012$gv. 86, p. 303-314
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
